Languages

Peak oxygen uptake. Myth and truth about an internationally accepted reference value.

TitlePeak oxygen uptake. Myth and truth about an internationally accepted reference value.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2005
AuthorsMeyer T, Scharhag J, Kindermann W
JournalZ Kardiol
Volume94
Issue4
Pagination255-64
Date Published2005 Apr
ISSN0300-5860
KeywordsClinical Trials as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine, Exercise Test, Heart Function Tests, Humans, Internationality, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Exertion, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Pulmonary Gas Exchange, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results, Respiratory Function Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity
Abstract

This article critically examines the execution of VO(2)-peak testing in cardiac patients and questions their appropriate interpretation. In the first part, the most common clinical implications of VO(2)peak measurements are discussed: assessment of (changes in) functional capacity, evaluation of the necessity of invasive diagnostic/therapeutic measures, reference for exercise prescriptions, determination of prognosis. In the second part, important methodological problems and constraints are addressed and illustrated by references to scientific studies. Finally, recommendations are given for meaningful VO(2)peak testing. It is evident that failure to strictly follow such recommendations might result in misleading ergometric findings and, thus, in over- or underestimation of endurance capacity and/ or training effects.

DOI10.1007/s00392-005-0207-4
Alternate JournalZ Kardiol
PubMed ID15803262
Undefined