Practitioner, Coach, and Athlete Perceptions of Evidence-Based Practice in Professional Sport in Australia

TitelPractitioner, Coach, and Athlete Perceptions of Evidence-Based Practice in Professional Sport in Australia
MedientypJournal Article
Year of Publication2021
AutorenSchwarz E, Harper LD, Duffield R, McCunn R, Govus A, Skorski S, Fullagar HHK
JournalInt J Sports Physiol Perform
Date Published2021 12 01
SchlüsselwörterAthletes, Evidence-Based Practice, Humans, Knowledge, Sports, Surveys and Questionnaires

PURPOSE: To examine practitioners', coaches', and athletes' perceptions of evidence-based practice (EBP) in professional sport in Australia.

METHODS: One hundred thirty-eight participants (practitioners n = 67, coaches n = 39, and athletes n = 32) in various professional sports in Australia each completed a group-specific online questionnaire. Questions focused on perceptions of research, the contribution of participants' own experience in implementing knowledge to practice, sources, and barriers for accessing and implementing EBP, preferred methods of feedback, and the required qualities of practitioners.

RESULTS: All practitioners reported using EBP, while most coaches and athletes believed that EBP contributes to individual performance and preparation (>85%). Practitioners' preferred EBP information sources were "peer-reviewed journals" and "other practitioners within their sport," while athlete sources were "practitioners within their sport" and "other athletes within their sport." As primary barriers to accessing and implementing research, practitioners highlighted "time constraints," "poor research translation," and "nonapplicable research." Practitioners ranked "informal conversation" as their most valued method of providing feedback; however, coaches prefer feedback from "scheduled meetings," "online reports," or "shared database." Both athletes and coaches value "excellent knowledge of the sport," "experience," and "communication skills" in practitioners disseminating EBP.

CONCLUSION: Practitioners, coaches, and athletes believe in the importance of EBP to their profession, although practitioners reported several barriers to accessing and implementing research as part of EBP. Athletes place a high value on experienced practitioners who have excellent knowledge of the sport and communication skills. Collectively, these findings can be used to further stakeholder understanding regarding EBP and the role of research to positively influence athlete health.

Alternate JournalInt J Sports Physiol Perform
PubMed ID34000715