Languages

Reliability and Association with Injury of Movement Screens: A Critical Review.

TitleReliability and Association with Injury of Movement Screens: A Critical Review.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2016
AuthorsMcCunn R, der Fünten KAus, Fullagar HHK, McKeown I, Meyer T
JournalSports Med
Volume46
Start Page763
Issue6
ISSN1179-2035
Abstract

Subjective assessment of athletes' movement quality is widely used by physiotherapists and other applied practitioners within many sports. One of the beliefs driving this practice is that individuals who display 'poor' movement patterns are more likely to suffer an injury than those who do not. The aim of this review was to summarize the reliability of the movement screens currently documented within the scientific literature and explore the evidence surrounding their association with injury risk. Ten assessments with accompanying reliability data were identified through the literature search. Only two of these ten had any evidence directly related to injury risk. A number of methodological issues were present throughout the identified studies, including small sample sizes, lack of descriptive rater or participant information, ambiguous injury definitions, lack of exposure time reporting and risk of bias. These factors, combined with the paucity of research on this topic, make drawing conclusions as to the reliability and predictive ability of movement screens difficult. None of the movement screens that appear within the scientific literature currently have enough evidence to justify the tag of 'injury prediction tool'.

DOI10.1007/s40279-015-0453-1
Alternate JournalSports Med
PubMed ID26721517
Undefined